IAV Devpanion
More output, same headcount
Projects grow. Headcount doesn’t. Requirements and test specs eat up engineering hours that should go into development. The bottleneck isn’t your team. It’s the manual work around it.
What IAV Devpanion does
- Collects from all sources – import Excel, CSV, PDFs, or meeting notes. One structured set from scattered inputs.
- Checks requirements quality – flags clarity, testability, and consistency issues. Every finding includes a concrete rewrite suggestion.
- Generates test specifications – structured, review-ready test cases with correct nomenclature. What took 2 hours now takes 20 minutes.²
Processes 100+ requirements in one run. Exports to DOORS, Codebeamer, or Excel. No system replacement.
Results from real engineering projects
What changes in practice
- Reviews in hours, not days. Gaps, contradictions, and ambiguities surface before they cause rework downstream. We show you how, step by step
- Test specs ready before the meeting ends. What used to block your testers for hours is generated in minutes. See the workflow live
- Fewer errors reaching downstream teams. Issues are flagged before they leave the desk, not after they cause rework.
- No migration, no new tools. Plugs into your existing toolchain. Start with a pilot alongside your current workflow.
IAV Devpanion lets my team deliver faster without adding headcount. Requirements and test specs that used to block us for days now flow in hours.
Your engineers do engineering
Not formatting. Not copy-pasting between documents. Not writing the same test structure for the twentieth time. IAV Devpanion handles the repetitive work so your team focuses on decisions, edge cases, and the problems that actually need their expertise.
Enterprise-grade security. Built for regulated industries.
- EU hosting available – your data stays in Europe.
- GDPR compliant – fully aligned with European data protection regulation.
- ISO 27001 certified – information security management at the highest standard.
- SOC 2 compliant – independently verified security controls.
- DPA available – data processing agreement on request.
Your data stays in your browser. We do not store it in our backend, and we do not use it to train any model.
Developed by IAV
IAV has been engineering partner to automotive, aerospace, and industrial leaders for over 40 years. IAV Devpanion brings that domain expertise into an AI-powered tool – built by engineers, for engineers.
Common questions
No. Every suggestion shows its source document and reasoning. You see which check triggered a finding and why. Approve or reject changes step by step. Nothing changes without explicit sign-off.
Yes. No system replacement, no complex integration project. IAV Devpanion exports to DOORS, Codebeamer, Excel, or your existing toolchain. Configure presets for your domain standards. Start with a pilot alongside your current workflow.
That is when IAV Devpanion helps most. It surfaces problems in your input data that humans overlook under time pressure. The messier your inputs, the more time you save.
IAV Devpanion was built specifically for requirements and test engineering. Every suggestion is traceable to source documents. Real projects show over 80% usable outputs³ after preset tuning.
Browser-based processing only. No permanent storage, no model training with your data. Full details in the security section above.
Already have access?
Book your appointment now.
30 minutes. Your scattered documents, structured live. Pick a slot.
Sources & Methodology
¹ Estimated 57% time savings apply only to the selected activities “requirements refinement” and “test case creation” within the “Requirements Review to Test Specification” workflow. The estimate combines evaluation data, survey results, and end-user feedback; it is not a controlled benchmark, and results may vary by project and configuration. The estimate does not cover other development team tasks.
² Based on end-user feedback. Manual effort estimated at ~1-2 h, with IAV Devpanion ~20-25 min per requirement. Results vary by complexity and experience.
³ End-user feedback from an automotive testing project. “Usable” refers to reviewer-acceptable drafts; quality depends on preset tuning and input data quality. Human review remains required.
⁴ REA potential A/B Test (IAV Devpanion Requirements). “Up to 53%” refers to the best observed case for sets >100 requirements; average reduction was 25%.