Scroll

Requirements. Up to 53% faster.*

For requirements engineers dealing with scattered documents, inconsistent sources, reviews that take forever. IAV Devpanion turns unstructured inputs into clean, testable requirements in minutes.

Book a live demo Watch 1-min overview

Developed by IAV

Engineering partner to automotive, aerospace, and industrial leaders for over 40 years.

Take 1 minute. See requirements get structured.

In 30 minutes, you'll know if it fits

No slides, no pitch deck. Just a live look at how IAV Devpanion turns real documents into structured, testable requirements.

Sample data, structured live

We load sample documents from real engineering projects. You watch them become structured requirement statements. In seconds, live in the demo.

Person seen from behind looking at a screen displaying the recognisable text “Refinement”.

Every check, on screen

Clarity, atomicity, testability. Concrete rewrite suggestions, not just red flags. You see what gets flagged and why.

Rückansicht eines Mannes mit Kopfhörern, der vor einem Computerbildschirm in einem Büro sitzt.

Your workflow, unchanged

DOORS, Codebeamer, Excel. No tool switch, no IT project. Start alongside what you use today.

Book your live demo now!

30 minutes. Your scattered documents, structured live. Pick a slot.

Showcases

Up to 53% faster reviews²

"Up to 53% faster reviews with >100 requirements."

The larger the set, the greater the gain. Consistency checks, duplication detection, and quality scoring at scale. Average reduction: 25%.²

Ø 25% less processing time²

"25% average reduction in review processing time."

Not a best case, an average. Across requirement sets of varying size and complexity. The more requirements, the greater the gain.

Contradictions caught before review

"7 days vs. 30 days, spotted instantly."

Consistency check surfaces conflicts across thousands of requirements. You focus on resolving, not finding.

Quality up, not just speed

"REA confirmed our findings and identified additional issues."

IAV Devpanion doesn’t just confirm what manual reviews find. It catches issues that slip through. Better quality, not just faster throughput.

Your benefits

PDFs, spreadsheets, meeting notes. All consolidated into one requirement set. No more switching between documents to find what you need.

IAV Devpanion is a very practical helper to make requirement reviews more robust and reliable. Great work.

Erik Ullmann

Test Automation Engineer, Autonomous Driving and ITS

Proven on real engineering projects

Used by requirements engineers across automotive, aerospace, and industrial projects. Same scattered inputs. Same review pressure. See how it works for yours. 30 minutes, no pitch deck, no obligations.

Book a live demo

Common questions

What engineering leaders ask before adopting AI in their workflow.

Yes. IAV Devpanion ingests PDFs, spreadsheets, and unstructured notes. It auto-structures the content into clean requirement statements and runs an immediate quality check. No manual reformatting on your side.

IAV Devpanion runs clarity and testability checks on each requirement. It flags vague language, compound statements, missing boundary conditions, and proposes concrete rewrites. You review and approve each suggestion individually.

No. Every suggestion is explainable with sources. You see which check triggered the suggestion and why. Approve or reject changes step by step. Nothing gets changed without your explicit sign-off.

Up to 53% faster reviews on sets with >100 requirements. Average reduction: 25%.² The consistency check also catches issues that manual reviews miss.

Yes. No system replacement, no complex integration. Export to DOORS, Codebeamer, Excel, or your existing toolchain. Configure presets for your domain standards. Start with a pilot alongside your current workflow.

No strings attached

The demo runs on our sample data. No uploads, no prep work. You watch, you judge. If it’s not for you, no follow-up calls, no email sequences.

Enterprise-grade security

Built for regulated industries. EU hosting available. Your data stays yours.

Man looks focused. Code is reflected in his glasses.

Clean requirements. Faster reviews. Less rework.

30 minutes. You watch sample documents become structured requirements. You judge the quality yourself. No prep, no follow-up pressure.

Book a live demo

Sources and Methodology

*/² REA potential A/B Test (IAV Devpanion Requirements). “Up to 53%” refers to the best observed case for sets >100 requirements; average reduction was 25%.