Developed by IAV

Engineering partner to automotive, aerospace, and industrial leaders for over 40 years.

Take 1 minute. See tests get generated.

In 30 minutes, you'll know if it fits

No slides, no pitch deck. Just a live look at how IAV Devpanion generates test specifications from real requirements.

Book your live demo now!

30 minutes. Your 2-hour task, done in 20. Pick a slot.

Showcases

Test specs: 2 hours → 20 minutes²

From 2h to 20min per spec. Repetitive structures at scale.

Manual test spec creation takes 1 to 2 hours per requirement. IAV Devpanion generates review-ready drafts in about 20 minutes. You focus on edge cases and critical scenarios instead of boilerplate.

Test quality: >80% usable after preset tuning³

"We got >80% usable tests after preset tuning."

Configure domain presets for your standards. After tuning, outputs are production-ready drafts. Fine-tune further as you learn what works best.

Multi-source test design: 30–50% time saved⁴

"30–50% time saved on test design."

IAV Devpanion reads E/E descriptions, A2L files, and architecture docs to propose complete test cases. No more switching between sources to piece together what needs testing.

New projects: > 50% time saved⁵

"Less experienced testers benefit even more, saving over 50%."

Starting a new project or new to the domain? The preset does the heavy lifting from day one. You focus on understanding the system, not writing boilerplate test cases.

Your benefits

Repetitive structures are generated. You spend your time on the tests that actually need your expertise: edge cases, critical scenarios, domain-specific logic.

High quality of generated test cases, more than 80% were successful. After editing the preset it was even better.

Erik Ullmann
Test Automation Engineer, Autonomous Driving and ITS

Proven on real testing projects

Used by test engineers across automotive, aerospace, and industrial projects. Same time pressure. Same monotone specs. See how it works for yours. 30 minutes, no pitch deck, no obligations.

Common questions

What test engineers ask before bringing AI into their workflow.

Yes. IAV Devpanion works with structured and unstructured inputs: E/E descriptions, A2L files, architecture docs, free-text specs. In the demo, we show you with sample data from real projects.

Day one. You can expect over 80% immediately usable test specs after preset tuning. Configure presets for your domain standards. The more you fine-tune, the better the outputs get.

Yes. IAV Devpanion reads E/E descriptions, A2L files, architecture docs, and more to propose complete test cases in minutes. You save 30 to 50% on multi-source test design.

No. Every generated test spec shows its source requirement and the reasoning behind it. You can verify any output in seconds. Explainable steps, sources, and reviewer gates at every point.

Yes. IAV Devpanion exports to your existing toolchain: DOORS, Codebeamer, Excel, or custom formats. No system replacement needed. Start with a pilot alongside your current workflow.

No strings attached

The demo runs on our sample data. No uploads, no prep work on your side. If it’s not a fit, we’re upfront about it. No follow-up calls, no email sequences.

Enterprise-grade security

Built for regulated industries. EU hosting available. Your data stays yours.
EU hosted
ISO 27001
TISAX
DPA
GDPR

Review-ready tests. Not line-by-line writing.

30 minutes. You watch test cases get generated from sample requirements. You judge the quality yourself. No prep, no follow-up pressure.

Sources and Methodology

*/² Based on end-user feedback. Manual effort estimated at ~1-2 h, with IAV Devpanion ~20-25 min per requirement. Results vary by complexity and experience.

³ End-user feedback from an automotive testing project. “Usable” refers to reviewer-acceptable drafts; quality depends on preset tuning and input data quality. Human review remains required.

⁴ Self-reported time savings from user feedback and surveys (IAV Devpanion Testing). Results vary by task complexity, source quality, and user experience.

⁵ Self-reported from user feedback and surveys. At the start of new projects or for less experienced testers, time savings can exceed 50%. Results vary by project scope and prior experience.